blog.org Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the blog.org

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host blog.org. Currently, hosted in United States and its service provider is Oak Point Partners Inc .

the related websites

johnwatsonblog.co.uk blog.thewhiskyexchange.com taradennis.com.au news.bbc.co.uk telegram.org mcmillanspeed.com ft.com dysonmedic.co.uk dynamicscrm.blog jancisrobinson.com 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called nginx/1.14.1 containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

the blog of david brake academic, consultant & journalist david brake 's blog weblog on the internet and public policy, journalism, virtual community, and more from david brake, a canadian academic, consultant and journalist 8 march 2018 valuable new research on inequalities in online participation filed under: about the internet , best of blog.org , digital divide (developed countries) , digital divide (developing countries) , literacies at11:00 am a new paper by aaron shaw and one of my favourite scholars, eszter hargittai , provides some fascinating insights into why there are inequalities in people’s participation online – in this case in editing wikipedia. tl;dr a representative survey of the us population shows 3.5% had never heard of wikipedia, of those who had heard of it, 18.5% said they had never visited (probably an overstatement), and 32% did not know that wikipedia is editable by anyone – only 8% of those surveyed had ever edited themselves . they also found that the likelihood they know wikipedia is editable varies quite widely depending on user’s overall internet skills but also, importantly, on their overall education level. even among those who have the highest general internet skills, 25% of those without college degrees didn’t realise they could edit wikipedia – and among women with low education and low general internet skills only 28% realised they could edit wikipedia . imagine how much better wikipedia could be if the knowledge, interests and experiences of the 92% of non-editors could be mobilised! what’s not in the paper now, drawing on my own thinking about this area (which i was delighted to see them reference), let’s talk a bit about some of the overarching issues that this paper doesn’t really dig into (no criticism intended here – you can’t cover everything in a single paper!) here’s the researchers’ conceptual “participation pipeline”: imagine however that the pipe’s size reflected the actual narrowing at each point (sorry i can’t redraw it but maybe the authors or one of you would like to have a go?). first you would need a section of pipe before “internet users” to show all potential users. in the us, the latest survey data shows 9% of the public still doesn’t use the internet – and a full third of all older people or people with less than a high school education (1). if you are interested, as i am, in participation on the internet globally, the pipe would narrow much more sharply and earlier in other parts of the world – over half of the world still isn’t on the internet. (source: itu ) after this, the pipe would narrow a bit by “has heard of” and “has visited” wikipedia but it would narrow more by “knows it’s possible to edit” (the key finding of this paper). where the pipe really gets narrow, however, is among those who know they could contribute but don’t (92% of the population). and what this paper couldn’t really get at is why . we still don’t know enough about this but i suggest a few explanations: ease of access and device type matter – it’s much easier to edit wikipedia on a computer than on a mobile phone but there are many who access the internet mainly or exclusively on their mobiles. freedom of access matters – not so much an issue in the us but there are many countries where internet use is closely monitored and where writing the ‘wrong thing’ in a wikipedia entry could get you into serious trouble with your government. internalised power structures. if as a woman, say, or or a poor person or an ethnic minority you are accustomed not to have your voice heard, might you assume nobody wanted to hear it on wikipedia either (especially if existing wikipedia articles seemed unsympathetic to your point of view, or if your experience of the editing process was unsympathetic). if you did not have much formal education, you might find it difficult to express yourself in writing and you might be concerned that what you wrote might be scorned or mocked because of spelling or grammatical errors. (for an academic gloss on this, you might want to start with bourdieu ). lastly, there is a further narrowing of the pipe at the end which the authors could (and really should) have taken into consideration – the question of intensity of use. we know from other research that most people who do edit wikipedia do so infrequently, but most wikipedia edits overall are made by a tiny number of very active editors: by dragons flight – own work , cc by-sa 4.0 , link by dragons flight – own work , cc by-sa 4.0 , link the survey they used would not be able to give statistical information about the backgrounds of those editors but there may be some data about this from wikipedia’s own surveys and i would be astonished if research did not reveal that most edits made on wikipedia overall are done by a highly privileged subset of all wikipedia editors, mainly because of those internalised power structures i mentioned above. conclusion most of us (and in particular many internet scholars) are accustomed to talk about how ubiquitous and accessible and empowering tools like wikipedia, weblogs and the like are, but as this research shows it is important to bear in mind how far many potential users are from playing an equal part in online spaces. it’s important to remember how dissimilar internet researchers and pundits are from the whole population – if you are reading this i am guessing you have edited at least one wikipedia page – i’ve edited about a hundred and i don’t even consider myself an avid wikipedian. moreover in looking at the us this research is already looking at the top of the global participation pyramid. we need much more research to highlight the extent of participation gaps globally and action to narrow those gaps. footnotes: i think that the analysis that this paper did quotes figures for the us population not just for the us online population (even though the survey they did was done online) but if not, you would have to take into account that participation is even more skewed away from the lower-educated (and older) because they are less online in the first place. -- comments (0) 23 february 2017 be careful what you ask for… filed under: about the internet , academia , current affairs (us) , current affairs (world) , digital divide (developed countries) , journalism , online media , positive uses of technology , problems with technology , weblogs at7:31 am as an media scholar and journalist with an interest in the digital divide, i have long believed that one of the things that media outlets could do a lot better is using their higher profile to give a voice to ‘ordinary people’ who have something to say. i also believe that one of the things that facebook like other news intermediaries should be trying to do is increase ideological diversity in their feeds. lastly, i am aware that it is not right to judge what people say online just because it is poorly written technically. and then this happens. this is my top facebook recommended story on facebook’s top trending issue. the story’s summary suggests it is from the huffington post, which has some journalistic credibility, but if you visit the story itself and look carefully you will see that it is an un-edited, un-curated self published blog posting. it is also badly written, bigoted, and dismayingly lacking in concrete, citable facts. there was a riot of violence and destructions by immigrants in the capitol of sweden, stockholm. the police was forced to shoot with ammunition to put and end to it. in malmö, another city south in sweden they have struggle with gang violence and lawlessness for years. so when trump talk about that sweden have an immigration problem he [trump] is actually spot on. it’s well known for scandinavians and other europeans that liberal immigration comes with drugs, rapes, gang wars, robbery and violence (for a more nuanced view of recent events in sweden, read this .) in the end, i think that what this underlines is another of my personal

URL analysis for blog.org

http://blog.org/category/current-affairs-us/
http://blog.org/2015/03/the-news-long-tail-are-readers-journalists-and-advertisers-interests-diverging/#respond
http://blog.org/category/tech-policy-issues/e-democracy/
http://blog.org/2018/03/
http://blog.org/category/problems-with-technology/
http://blog.org/category/research/literacies/
http://blog.org/2015/06/facts-vs-analysis-in-journalism-doris-day-discussed-this-50-years-ago/#comments
http://blog.org/2017/02/be-careful-what-you-ask-for/#respond
http://blog.org/category/tech-policy-issues/digital-divide-developed-countries/
http://blog.org/category/publishing/
http://blog.org/category/academia/
http://blog.org/category/tech-policy-issues/negative-uses-of-technology/
http://blog.org/2015/03/never-mind-the-death-of-the-blog-what-about-the-decline-of-the-discussion-forum/#comments
http://blog.org/category/positive-uses-of-technology/
http://blog.org/2015/03/the-news-long-tail-are-readers-journalists-and-advertisers-interests-diverging/
electionanalysis.uk
journalism.co.uk
bbc.co.uk
thestudentroom.co.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: BLOG.ORG
Registry Domain ID: D12487296-LROR
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.joker.com
Registrar URL: http://www.joker.com
Updated Date: 2018-10-13T13:58:13Z
Creation Date: 1999-11-08T16:53:26Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2019-11-08T16:53:26Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date:
Registrar: CSL Computer Service Langenbach GmbH d/b/a joker.com a German GmbH
Registrar IANA ID: 113
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: [email protected]
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +49.21186767447
Reseller:
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registrant Organization:
Registrant State/Province: England
Registrant Country: GB
Name Server: NS1.CFRQ.NET
Name Server: NS3.CFRQ.NET
Name Server: NS4.CFRQ.NET
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form https://www.icann.org/wicf/)
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2019-01-25T23:07:24Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

Access to Public Interest Registry WHOIS information is provided to assist persons in determining the contents of a domain name registration record in the Public Interest Registry registry database. The data in this record is provided by Public Interest Registry for informational purposes only, and Public Interest Registry does not guarantee its accuracy. This service is intended only for query-based access. You agree that you will use this data only for lawful purposes and that, under no circumstances will you use this data to (a) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission by e-mail, telephone, or facsimile of mass unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations to entities other than the data recipient's own existing customers; or (b) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes that send queries or data to the systems of Registry Operator, a Registrar, or Afilias except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or modify existing registrations. All rights reserved. Public Interest Registry reserves the right to modify these terms at any time. By submitting this query, you agree to abide by this policy.

The Registrar of Record identified in this output may have an RDDS service that can be queried for additional information on how to contact the Registrant, Admin, or Tech contact of the queried domain name.

  REFERRER http://www.pir.org/

  REGISTRAR Public Interest Registry

SERVERS

  SERVER org.whois-servers.net

  ARGS blog.org

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME blog.org

  HANDLE D12487296-LROR

  CREATED 1999-08-11

STATUS
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited

NSERVER

  NS1.CFRQ.NET 172.104.150.145

  NS3.CFRQ.NET 159.203.46.241

  NS4.CFRQ.NET (DOES NOT EXIST)

OWNER

ADDRESS

  STATE England

  COUNTRY GB

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .